| Feature Article |
THE DURHAM BEAD SITE (8LL1920), NORTH
FORT MEYERS, LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA
|
by Calvin Jones, Archaeologist,
Bureau of Archaeological Research. June 1, 1997
|
A visit to this unusual glass bead site located in Northwest Fort Meyers,
Florida was made on December 30, 1996 at the request of Mr. Jim Durham
of Fort Pierce, and Mr. Tom Jackson of Sarasota. Mr. Durham first visited
the site more than 10 years ago and began some excavations for beads and
other artifacts. Since that time, several hundred gallons of primarily
glass seed beads (Figure 1) have
been sifted out of this site – the most the author has ever seen
or known of from any site in the Southeastern United States (Figure 2).
 |
Photo of beads from the site, greatly magnified,
that
appeared with an article in Vol. 22-4 of IAM
|
Some significant questions concerning the age of
the beads and the purpose of them at this site remain because no comparable
sites with
similar beads have been located anywhere in the Southeast. Because of
this lack of specific data about the beads and their context, some controversy
exists about the function and integrity of the site. However, based on
the author’s visit to the site, where he was able to view excavation
of the beads in situ by Mr. Durham and Mr. Jackson, the author has no
doubt about the integrity of the site and its challenge for accurate
chronological and cultural identification.
 |
| Location of bead site, see description in text. |
Location and Historical Background
This site is located on the west side of Barret Street about one half
mile south of the Pine Island Road (78) in North Fort Meyers, Florida.
It is situated diagonally across the street from a fire station.
Within an original pine flatwoods setting, this site lies about .25 miles
west of Yellow Fever Creek, a tributary of the Calusahatchee River. A
springfed sinkhole is reported to have been located just west of the
bead site lot.
Presently, the site is occupied by a large home, which was constructed
in 1982. Previously, the lot contained a wooden structure that was occupied
by an elderly man who lived on the site for many years. Prior to his
habitation on the property, an elderly woman is reported to have lived
on the site for many years prior to the 1950s. No historical data relating
directly to the identity of the beads has been found.
Artifact Concentration and Context
In 1982 a bulldozer was used to clean up the lot and remains of a rotten
wooden structure. During this clean up and lot preparation for construction,
much of the soil containing beads was pushed around on the lot and
onto adjacent lots - where beads have been identified.
The sites original soil is light gray sand. Brown sand fill was apparently
brought to the site during preparation for building in 1982. It appears
to have become partially mixed with the natural soil and artifacts as
a result of bulldozing.
|
|
Sample showing glass beads
and aluminum bangles as they were
found in the earth.
|
On the approximately half acre lot where most of the beads have been
found to be concentrated, they appear to reach a subsurface depth of
about 30cm (1 ft.). This concentration is located along the front of
the lot, particularly in its south half where much burned wood, melted
glass (primarily clear), toy aluminum containers, aluminum bangles, and
other apparently early 20th century artifacts have been found. A small
quantity of 19th century glass shards, ceramic shards, and machine cut
iron nails have also been recovered from this area.
This area also contained clusters of melted glass beads, occurring in
a range of colors: red, yellow, blue, etc. These essentially seed bead
clumps clearly indicate that bead lots and colors were in some type of
separate containers prior to having melted in a fire. Other examples
from the area, however, also occasionally contained preserved hemp or
cotton string.
The bulk of glass beads are seed sizes and opaque, but bright in color.
Several medium size (5-7mm) necklace type beads are included in the assemblage.
One of these, an opaque yellow barrel-shaped head with red and green
stripes, is unique. Possible 19th century beads include medium sized
barrel-shaped brown beads with white and blue stripes, and a small five-sided,
faceted, semi-translucent seed size bead.
Mrs. Durham and Jackson gave a sample of beads and aluminum bangles
contained within a large dirt sample to the BAR. This sample was carefully
taken apart by Dave Dickell and now remains in the states permanent collections
(Figure 3).
Dating of the Site
Melted clear glass container fragments and clusters of rosette shaped
aluminum bangles associated with melted glass beads from the south
half of the bead lot seem to place these artifact types in chronological
context. Miniature non-usable coffee grinders and teapots made of sheet
aluminum also appear to be part of this assemblage. If this were true,
the dating of these beads and artifacts would appear to have occurred
after the beginning of the 20th century, most likely during the first
quarter of the century.
Though aluminum was discovered as early as 1746, it was not commercially
used until 1889, and then it was very expensive. It also remained very
costly until well into the 20th century. Its use in the manufacture of
bangles and toys was apparently not feasible until the 1920s or later.
Thus, the dating of the Durham Site and its function is not clear. There
is a possibility that it was a store or trading post for early 20th century
Seminoles. However, no correlation is known between the beads at the
site and decorated Seminole clothing. Or, this site may have been a warehouse
for the storage of goods sold at shops along U.S. Highway 41 during the
days of the Florida land boom in the 1920s and 1930s.
Because of the small quantity of definitive 19th century beads and other
artifacts recovered from excavation of the site over a period of years,
the author does not believe the site dates to the 19th century. He sees
no evidence to support its association with Harney's trading post, which
was located in the area near the Calusahatchee Rive during the early
19th century.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|